Criteria (Weight) | Professional (100%) | Thorough (80%) | Not Fully Developed (50%) | Does Not Meet Requirements (0%) |
Professional Format (30%) | Paper was generally well formatted, although not all specifications were met and/or data included was not properly formatted. Paper is approaching a professional standard. | Paper had significant formatting issues and/or was missing required information. | Paper had major formatting issues and/or none of the required specifications were met. | |
Consideration of the Case Facts (30%) | All relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision | Most relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision | Few relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision | Did not complete, or missing significant analytical points which were in the case data. |
Decision Rationale (30%) | The decision rationale was well supported based on the facts in the case. | The decision rationale was partially supported based on the facts in the case. | The decision rationale was only barely supported based on the facts in the case. | No recommendations or incorrect, superficial and not measurable. |
Format (10%) | Format to given standard, professional language used, no grammatical or spelling errors. | Format to given standard, professional language used, few grammatical or spelling errors. | Format not to given standard, unprofessional language used, grammatical or spelling errors. |
JWU1001
College of Online Education
Johnson & Wales University